Skip to content

Getting Online Votes: An Expert‘s Guide to Automatic Voting Bots and Strawpoll Manipulation

Online contests are ubiquitous these days. Pitch your startup and win funding on Product Hunt. Showcase your beauty skills to get crowned CoverGirl of the Year. Share your covetable vacation photos to score an all-expenses paid trip from Tourism Bureau XYZ.

The prize pool seems endless, tapping into our deepest desires – fame, fortune, clout. Who wouldn‘t want to win?

But here‘s the catch: you‘re up against thousands of contestants. Standing out takes more than just having great content or skills. It requires mastering the art of getting online votes.

This is where things get messy. You‘ve seen the leaderboards – vote counts soaring into the tens or hundreds of thousands. Not all of those can be real, organic voters… can they?

In this guide, you‘ll learn the hidden tactics people use to rack up votes. We‘ll uncover everything from simple vote brigades to sophisticated bots pulling the strings behind the scenes. While we don‘t encourage cheating, understanding these vote manipulation methods lets you participate in contests more strategically.

The Stakes Around Online Contest Votes

Before we dive into shady tactics, let‘s understand why people resort to vote manipulation in the first place.

The prizes are well worth the effort. Sponsors dangle life-changing rewards in front of contestants. Startup contests offer $25,000+ cash prizes and meetings with prominent investors. Beauty pageants promise modeling contracts and brand ambassador deals. Tourism photos contests give away luxury vacations and cash. For the cost of effort and technical resources, participants gain a shot at a big payoff.

Winning draws media coverage and fame. In addition to prizes, winners attract media attention. Top Product Hunt startups get covered widely in tech publications. Pageant winners become minor celebrities with guaranteed social media followers. For contests tied to influencer marketing, the exposure itself can be valuable.

Participants have no limit on spending. Within legal boundaries, contestants are free to invest unlimited resources into winning. Hiring a bot developer or proxy service costs peanuts compared to the value of prizes and attention. With no restrictions, an arms race ensues.

The stakes keep rising. Early on, basic vote begging through friends and family worked. But as more players leveraged technical tactics, vote counts rose exponentially. Now it takes advanced methods just to keep up as benchmarks reach hundreds of thousands of votes.

Under this backdrop, vote manipulation becomes tempting and often feels necessary. But how big of an issue is it really?

The Scale of Vote Manipulation Across Online Contests

While hard statistics are scarce, data indicates vote manipulation is widespread:

  • In a recent Product Hunt contest, the top startup earned over 370,000 votes – more than the entire city‘s population. Observers alleged bots were used.

  • The Miss Ocean 2022 contest logged over 630,000 Facebook votes for the winner – roughly 2% of the country‘s population.

  • In a recent analysis of Time Magazine‘s person of the year poll, a hacker demonstrated easily scripting votes via proxies.

These examples suggest vote tallies from manipulation likely reach into the hundreds of thousands or millions. Even adjusting for some organic votes, the scale is substantial.

And this manipulation is not limited to public online contests. Political straw polls are infamously gamed by special interests. Companies manipulate product rating sites like Yelp through fake reviews. Even metrics like app store rankings are artificially boosted by fraud.

While the exact scale is unknown, it‘s clear online vote manipulation is commonplace, whether through individual cheating or orchestrated fraud. Let‘s look at how it works under the hood.

Common Tactics Used to Manipulate Online Votes

Most online contests try to limit manipulation through validation methods:

  • Requiring login or registration
  • Tracking IP addresses
  • Using cookies to detect repeat voters

However, dedicated participants have found loopholes and workarounds:

Using multiple accounts – The simplest approach is creating new accounts with disposable emails. This works when registration is required but IP addresses aren‘t checked.

Changing IPs with proxies/VPNs – Masking your IP address allows recasting votes from "new" users. VPNs work but have limited IPs. Proxies offer larger, more granular IP pools.

Automating with bots + proxies – Automation allows effortlessly rotating IPs and accounts at scale. When paired with proxies, bots can potentially bypass protections.

Next we‘ll do a deeper dive on the technical side of common tactics.

Bypassing IP Limits Through Proxies and VPNs

Sites often limit one vote per IP address. To get around this, manipulators use virtual private networks (VPNs) and proxies to mask their origin.

VPNs encrypt traffic and pass it through remote server endpoints to hide the real IP. Turning on a VPN gives you an alternate IP and identity. However, VPNs have drawbacks:

  • Limited IP pool – VPNs only have so many endpoints, and IPs repeat
  • Detectable as proxy traffic – Sites can flag VPNs as potential bots/proxies
  • Slow IP switching – Disconnecting and reconnecting to change IPs is time consuming

Dedicated proxy services are superior for vote manipulation because:

  • Millions of IP addresses available, not just hundreds like on VPNs
  • Residential proxies come from real devices like homes and phones, mimicking organic traffic
  • Quickly programmatically rotate IPs to appear as unlimited unique voters

Especially valuable are residential proxy networks which source IPs from ISP subnets and residential broadband. Since the IPs originate from real homes and devices, they perfectly disguise bot votes as normal user traffic.

Rotating residential proxies is a stealthier way to bypass IP limits compared to amateur tactics like VPNs. Next we‘ll look at how bots leverage proxies to automate manipulation.

Bots Automate Voting at Scale When Combined With Proxies

Changing IPs manually to recast votes is tedious and limited. Automating the process with bots allows vote manipulation at scale.

Bots can handle login, site navigation, captcha solving, and more. But to be effective for votes, they need an ever-changing IP source to avoid reusing addresses. This is where combining bots and residential proxies becomes powerful.

Here is how bots manipulate votes in conjunction with proxies:

  • Bot loads a list of proxy IP:port combinations
  • Bot connects to site through first proxy
  • Completes vote via coded logic
  • Releases proxy, loads next
  • Repeats process for all proxies

Meanwhile, the bot automatically handles logging in with fake accounts, solving any verification checks, and navigating pages. The proxies enable constantly shifting IP addresses to avoid duplication flags.

This setup allows easy automation. The bot focuses on vote execution and site mechanics while the proxies provide endless clean IPs.

To demonstrate how unstoppable this combination can be, let‘s walk through a real-world example next.

Case Study: Gaming Strawpoll to Illuminate Tactics is a popular online polling site often used for contests. Users have openly shared scripts that leverage proxies and bots to manipulate Strawpoll votes.

While we don‘t encourage this behavior, it offers useful technical insight into how proxies and bots work together to bypass protections:

  • Strawpoll limits one vote per IP address, tracked via API call
  • Scripts use proxy API calls to cycle IP for each vote
  • Residential proxies mimic real phones/devices to appear as unique users

For example:

  1. Bot loads proxy list of residential IPs
  2. Requests Strawpoll API through first proxy
  3. API call registers vote from proxy IP
  4. Repeats for next proxy until all vote

The bot developers even track which specific residential proxies work best on Strawpoll without getting flagged. This level of optimization shows how far tools can advance.

While Strawpoll does have captchas and duplication checks, determined coders and proxy networks consistently break them. You can find many of these Strawpoll bot scripts openly on GitHub as users continually iterate and share techniques.

Now that we‘ve illustrated how bots and proxies manipulate votes, let‘s talk about why people build these tools in the first place.

Monetizing Voting Bots and Proxy Services

For tech-savvy users, developing voting bots and proxy services offers multiple income streams:

Selling bot access or service – Bot makers can sell vote automation as a service for contests. Access to sophisticated bots has monetary value.

Reselling residential proxies – Proxy operators aggregate residential IPs and wholesale them to bot masters at markup, especially proxies proven to work on high-value contests.

Promoting proxy/bot affiliate services – Bloggers and influencers also earn commissions promoting voting proxies and bots to their audiences.

Contest prize winnings – Naturally, bot creators use their own tools to win prizes and contests. The tech investment pays off.

There are legal ways to monetize proxies and bots. But vote manipulation creates ethical quandaries. Are those who build and sell these tools culpable in addition to dishonest contestants?

The developers counter that they operate legally in a gray area, offering general-purpose tools and leaving ethics up to others‘ discretion. But undoubtedly their inventions enable deception.

This exposes the underworld economy surrounding vote manipulation. While contests continue to soar in popularity, the ecosystem breeding bots and shady tactics marches ahead as well.

The Risks and Downsides of Voting Fraud

Before deploying bots and proxies to boost your campaign, consider the risks:

  • Account bans – Once caught, you‘ll likely be disqualified and prohibited from future contests.

  • CAPTCHAs and other obstacles – If you succeed, your tactics may spur enhanced bot detection like more frequent CAPTCHAs.

  • Blocked proxies – Low quality proxy services often get identified and blocked, rendering them unusable.

  • No guarantee of winning – Even with perfect bots and proxies, other contestants may be manipulating votes too. Yours may not be the best.

  • Diminishing returns – If everyone starts using bots, you have to keep upping your vote volumes. This escalation hurts legit participants.

While impressive technically, bots and proxies require significant resources with no guarantee of victory. And they detract from contests‘ core purpose – judging skills, content quality, and real user enthusiasm.

Maintaining Ethics in an Unvirtuous System

Given the temptations and incentives to manipulate votes, how do ethical participants cope?

Avoid contests prone to cheating – Seek out competitions focused on judging merit rather than raw votes. Or events from entities directly invested in integrity like government agencies or universities.

Call out suspicious activity – If you suspect manipulation, politely highlight abnormal vote patterns to contest hosts through proper channels. But avoid public accusations.

Advocate for improved protections – The best way to combat cheating is enhanced validation by contest creators. Support efforts for stronger duplicate and bot detection.

Focus on your own excellence – Rather than trying to beat possible bots and fraud, pour that energy into improving your skills and content. Perfect your craft and votes will follow.

While we don‘t recommend unethical tactics, we understand why some resort to them, especially when prizes and opportunities are so coveted. Where there are incentives to cheat, some will play by different rules.

But proxies and bots don‘t automatically guarantee votes or success. And they detract from the spirit of contests that aim to highlight merit and crowdsource opinions.

Where does this leave us? Online contests will only grow in prominence as creators continue engaging audiences through participation. With that comes increasingly sophisticated manipulation tactics – but also countermeasures as hosts strike back.

While we can‘t control others‘ choices, our energy is best spent focused inward, working diligently to let our abilities shine. Though the votes may be rigged, excellence speaks for itself. Your passion and skill already set you apart more than any gimmick or shortcut ever could.

Key Takeaways: A Recap

Let‘s recap the key lessons from our deep dive into the shadowy world of online vote manipulation:

  • Vote fraud is common as incentives for winning continue rising

  • Tactics range from simple multiple accounts to proxy/bot automation

  • Residential proxies and bots allow automating at huge scale

  • Strawpoll contests are often targeted given vulnerabilities

  • Monetization incentives perpetuate the bots and proxy ecosystem

  • Risks include bans, escalation, and no guarantee of victory

  • Focusing on merit and ethical promotion is better than cheating

While we don‘t encourage unethical behavior, arming yourself with knowledge helps make smart choices. May your next contest participation be fair and fruitful!


Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *