Skip to content

Deciding Between AWS Lambda and Apify for Your Web Scraping Projects

Are you looking to leverage a serverless platform for an upcoming web scraping project? As a fellow scraping expert, I‘m sure you‘ve come across AWS Lambda and Apify in your research. Both are compelling options. But which one is right for your specific use case?

In this comprehensive guide, I‘ll compare Lambda and Apify in-depth so you can make an informed decision based on your needs.

The Rise of Web Scraping

First, let‘s quickly discuss the state of web scraping today. Web scraping is growing rapidly as companies rely on data extraction to drive business insights. Recent surveys have found:

  • 60% of organizations now utilize web scraping as part of their operations.
  • The web scraping market size is expected to grow from $2.6B in 2019 to over $8B by 2026.
  • 90% of respondents reported web scraping provides them a competitive advantage in their industry.

This growth is being fueled by trends like data analytics, AI/ML models, and automation. As the practice expands, it‘s being powered by scalable cloud platforms rather than DIY scripts. That‘s where serverless solutions like AWS Lambda come in.

Lambda and Serverless Scraping

AWS Lambda is a popular service for running event-driven "serverless" code in the cloud. Some key traits of Lambda:

  • No servers to manage – Lambda handles compute resources
  • Automatic scaling – Smooths traffic spikes by running in parallel
  • Pay per use – Only pay for compute time used
  • Short run times – Max of 15 minutes per execution

With Lambda‘s auto-scaling, you can handle large workloads easily. As your scraper uncovers more pages, Lambda spins up instances in response to the load. This makes it a natural fit for many web scraping use cases.

Here‘s an example Python scraper running on Lambda:

import requests
from botocore.vendored import requests

def lambda_handler(event, context):

  # Fetch a page   
  response = requests.get("")

  # Extract data    
  data = parse_page(response.content)

  # Store data

  return data

Lambda is great for scraping tasks involving simple extraction and small datasets. However, Lambda poses some notable challenges when it comes to large or complex scraping projects:

Limited runtimes – Lambda caps at 15 minutes max per execution. This can be problematic for crawling large sites.

Scaling complexity – While Lambda scales, optimizing that scaling for scraping isn‘t straightforward. The crawling process doesn‘t fit Lambda‘s event model cleanly.

Data challenges – Scrapers produce sizable datasets, but Lambda has ephemeral storage. So external stores like S3 are needed.

As your web scraping needs grow in scale and sophistication, Lambda starts to show its weaknesses. Are there better serverless alternatives?

Exploring Lambda Alternatives

If you want to stick with serverless but find Lambda limiting, here are two alternatives worth considering:

Cloud Functions (GCP/Azure)

Google Cloud Functions and Azure Functions provide similar serverless platforms to AWS Lambda. The advantage here is being able to utilize multiple cloud providers for redundancy. But the core limitations around runtimes and scaling remain.

Specialized Scraping Services

Platforms designed specifically for web scraping have optimization "baked in" for the intricacies of crawling and data extraction. Some top services include:

  • Apify – The most robust scraping-focused option. Offers a complete web crawling infrastructure.
  • ScrapingHub – Enterprise-scale scraping solution. Integrates with Scrapy framework.
  • Diffbot – AI-powered extraction for structured web data.

For large scraping projects, these dedicated platforms often prove more efficient than general-purpose serverless clouds. Let‘s explore one of the best options – Apify.

Apify – A Closer Look

Apify bills itself as "The Scalable Web Scraping Platform". It was built from the ground up to power complex crawling operations. Here‘s an overview of Apify‘s key capabilities:

Actors – The core computation unit. Encapsulates scraping logic as microservices. Similar to Lambda functions.

Storage – A robust scraping-optimized storage for structured datasets, logs, etc.

Proxy Management – Rotating proxies to avoid IP blocking during large crawls.

Web UI – Central dashboard for visualizing jobs and extracted data.

API – REST API for managing Apify programmatically.

Integrations – Connectors for services like GitHub, Zapier, and Google Sheets.

Apify typically run each actor container in isolation for maximum concurrency across servers. Containers maintain environment consistency for your scrapers.

Apify actors support Node.js, Python, Java, and other languages. Here is an example Python scraper on Apify:

from apify_client import ApifyClient

def main():
  client = ApifyClient()

  # Enqueue URLs 

  # Get dataset  
  dataset = client.get_dataset("my-dataset")

  # Crawl pages
  for page in client.crawl_pages():
    data = extract_page_data(page)  

def extract_page_data(page):
  # Scrape page data

This gives you a sense of how Apify scaffolds out a typical scraping workflow. But how does it improve specifically on AWS Lambda‘s limitations?

Apify vs. Lambda for Web Scraping

Apify provides several key advantages compared to Lambda when it comes to scaling up production web scraping efforts:

ComparisonApifyAWS Lambda
Run TimeUnlimitedLimited to 15 min max
Scraping ToolsPython, NodeJS, Playwright, PuppeteerBring your own
ScalingAutomatic based on workloadManual boto3 calls
ProxiesBuilt-in proxy managementBYO proxy solution
Data StoragePersistent structured storageEphemeral unless using external
PricingPay per usePay per use

Based on large-scale crawling needs, Apify is better optimized for most production scenarios.

The unlimited run time is a major advantage over Lambda. Apify removes the need to orchestrate and stitch together invocations to handle large jobs. Actors simply run until the crawling is completed.

Automatic scaling on Apify is also smoother for web scraping. The platform allocates resources dynamically based on your workload. With Lambda, you have to manually adjust concurrency yourself as the job progresses.

Finally, Apify‘s built-in proxy rotation helps avoid scraping thresholds and IP blocks. This is essential for success when scraping at scale.

Putting Apify Into Action

The best way to see Apify‘s advantages is to see it in action. Let‘s walk through a sample use case:

Scraping Task – Crawl all product listings on an ecommerce site. Extract key fields like title, price, images, etc. Goal is to collect structured data on the full catalog.

With Lambda, we‘d need to:

  1. Create a Lambda function to scrape each product page
  2. Architect a system to crawl the site and find all pages
  3. Coordinate invocations to stay under runtime limits
  4. Store extracted data in S3 or a database
  5. Add a proxy service to avoid blocks

This requires significant orchestration. Now let‘s see this with Apify:

  1. Build an actor to scrape fields from each page
  2. Create a dataset for our structured catalog data
  3. Connect crawling logic to find all pages
  4. Link it to the dataset to store outputs
  5. Run the actor and Apify will scale it as needed

Much simpler! Apify handles the hard parts around scaling, storage, and proxies for us. We just focus on the scraping logic.

Key Takeaways and Recommendations

So when is AWS Lambda the right choice? What cases call for a solution like Apify instead? Here are my key recommendations based on your web scraping needs:


  • Scraping small, defined datasets
  • Simple extraction use cases
  • Tight integration with AWS stack
  • Budget concerns – lower resource overhead


  • Large crawling operations – 10k+ pages
  • Complex extraction workflows
  • High scale required – frequent runs
  • Stringent performance needs
  • Scheduled/automated runs

If you‘re just getting started with web scraping and data extraction, Lambda provides an easy serverless starting point. But as your projects grow in scale and sophistication, purpose-built scraping platforms like Apify deliver much needed optimizations for successful large-scale operations.

I hope this guide has provided useful insights into both the possibilities and limitations of AWS Lambda for web scraping. When making your decision, carefully consider the size and performance requirements of your specific use case. Optimizing your scraping stack from the start will pay dividends as your data needs grow over time.

Please feel free to reach out if you need any personalized advice or have additional questions! I‘m always happy to chat web scraping with fellow devs and data engineers.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *