Skip to content

Pinecone is great for GenAI, but so are these vector databases!

As someone who‘s worked in web scraping and proxies for over 5 years, I‘m excited by how much large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT are transforming AI. But I also know their limitations all too well.

That‘s why I love seeing new innovations like vector databases that help overcome issues like ChatGPT‘s limited word count and outdated knowledge. Pinecone has made a big splash as a leader in this area. However, as a long-time open source fan, I‘m also thrilled by the emergence of open-source alternatives to Pinecone‘s proprietary cloud offering.

In this post, I‘ll dig into six compelling options, as well as how combining them with other tools like LangChain unlocks new possibilities!

First, let‘s recap why vector databases are so crucial for getting the most out of LLMs…

How do vector databases help LLMs thrive?

LLMs have exploded in popularity thanks to their ability to generate amazingly coherent text. But under the hood, they face a couple core constraints:

1) Strict word limits

Due to their design, LLMs can only accept a certain number of tokens as input. For example, a standard ChatGPT query is limited to 2048 tokens, or about 300 words.

To provide more context, you need to fine-tune the model on new data or extract only the most relevant text as input. This can be tedious and time-consuming.

That‘s where vector databases shine! They can store text as vector embeddings – numerical representations that capture semantic meaning. This condenses content into a format that fits within the LLM‘s limited context.

According to Pinecone, their vector database enables queries with 10x more words than otherwise possible! This additional context makes a huge difference in the quality and specificity of LLM responses.

2) Knowledge cut off in 2021

As you probably know, LLMs like ChatGPT were trained only on data before 2021. So good luck asking them about recent events, trends, or anything requiring real-time info!

Pinecone highlights how their customers use their vector database to provide LLMs with up-to-date knowledge. For example, by ingesting latest news and research papers to enable better answers.

This ability to continually expand an LLM‘s knowledge is incredibly powerful. I‘ve been able to improve customer projects by feeding fresh, targeted data from web scraping into vector databases.

The bottom line is that vector databases unlock more possibilities from LLMs by overcoming built-in limits. Now let‘s explore open source options beyond the popular Pinecone API.

Why consider Pinecone alternatives?

There‘s no doubt Pinecone offers an amazing managed cloud service for vector storage and retrieval. Their documentation and support are top-notch.

However, Pinecone is a closed proprietary system. As an open source fan, I‘m always keen to explore alternatives. Here are some benefits that attract me:

  • Flexibility – Open source allows customizing and extending the database to suit your needs.

  • Cost – Avoid recurring fees by self-hosting open source databases.

  • Control – Take ownership of your data and system architecture rather than rely on a third-party.

  • Community – Open source projects tend to have active communities that help drive innovation.

Now let‘s dig into the top alternatives I‘ve been keeping an eye on!

6 compelling open source vector databases

Here are six open source vector databases that offer intriguing alternatives to Pinecone:

Weaviate {Semantically structured data}

In early 2024, Weaviate‘s series A funding reached $15 million as their open-source downloads surpassed two million. Their series B in April 2024 raised a whopping $50 million!

Unlike Pinecone‘s general vector database, Weaviate focuses specifically on natural language and numerical data based on contextualized word embeddings.

According to Weaviate [1], this "allows the data structure and relationships to remain present in the vectors". This means you can run semantic searches and ask questions that rely on context.

Weaviate is great for apps that need:

  • Semantic capabilities like natural language search
  • Ability to refine vectors withGraphQL context
  • Vector similarity and classification

My take: Weaviate seems ideal for Q&A bots and semantic search. Pinecone still has the edge for general vector storage/retrieval.

Milvus {Massive scalability}

Milvus is another open-source vector database written in Go. It was created by Zilliz, which raised $113 million in funding just last year.

According to Zilliz [2], Milvus handles trillions of vectors and is tested on "…datasets with up to 512 dimensions and 56 billion vectors."

Key features:

  • Handles high dimensionality vectors
  • Tuned for GPU/CPU efficiency
  • Advanced monitoring/alerting
  • Horizontal scalability

Milvus is purpose-built to ingest large volumes of vectorized data from unstructured sources. Ideal use cases per Zilliz [3]:

  • Image similarity/retrieval
  • Voice recognition
  • Recommendation systems
  • Time series analysis

My take: Milvus is unmatched for large-scale vector processing. Pinecone still better for simpler use cases needing less scale.

Chroma {In-memory JavaScript/Python}

Chroma markets itself as an in-memory vector store for Node.js and Python developers. It raised $3.6 million in seed funding in early 2024.

As described on their site [4], Chroma provides:

  • Local ephemeral vector storage
  • 100x faster response than remote databases
  • SDKs for Node.js and Python
  • Vector operations powered by CUDA
  • OpenTelemetry metrics

Chroma is essentially an embeddable vector engine for JavaScript and Python apps. All data lives in local memory rather than requiring an external database.

Great for low latency apps where vectors don‘t need persistence. But storage is transient and limited by available RAM.

My take: Excellent for real-time ML apps where ultra-low latency matters. Persistent storage needs still better with Pinecone/others.

Qdrant {Lightning fast similarity}

Qdrant impressed me by being developed fully in Rust rather than a GC language. As their site explains [5], this makes Qdrant:

  • Fast – Benchmarks faster than competitors
  • Reliable – No GC pauses even under heavy load
  • Safe – Rust‘s safety prevents crashes/downtime

Other key features [6]:

  • Vector payload supports many data types
  • Filters enable semantic matching/search
  • Works for neural nets, recommendation systems, more

Qdrant seems ideal for powering:

  • Semantic product search
  • Content recommendation
  • Anomaly detection in time series
  • Faceted filtering

My take: Qdrant‘s speed and filtering make it stand out. But Pinecone still ahead in usability and community.

You may recognize Faiss as coming from Facebook AI. Per their GitHub [7], Faiss provides:

  • Searching across billions of vectors
  • Support for wide range of data types
  • Optimization for speed and accuracy
  • Works for images, audio, video, etc

Some unique aspects of Faiss [8]:

  • Indexing – Faiss is an index for vector search rather than a full database
  • Approximate search – Trades off accuracy for speed

Faiss is ideal when you need:

  • Fast search across massive vector datasets
  • Support for exotic data types
  • Don‘t require exact precision

My take: Faiss wins for huge-scale vector indexing/search. Pinecone better for general usage requiring precision.

LlamaIndex {Framework for LLM apps}

Formerly known as GPT Index, LlamaIndex seems more focused on empowering developers to build LLM apps. As they describe [9]:

  • Data ingestion system
  • Tools for structuring, organizing, and retrieving data
  • Integrations with app frameworks like LangChain

Benefits highlighted by LlamaIndex [10]:

  • Query data for any LLM use case
  • Improves relevancy of LLM responses
  • Built-in integrations with popular frameworks
  • Ready to work with models like GPT-3

My take: More a toolset for devs than a core vector engine like Pinecone. Very complementary capabilities though!

Comparison of Pinecone alternatives

Here‘s a quick table summarizing the key strengths of each open source vector database we covered:

Database Key Strengths
Weaviate Semantic capabilities, refined vectors
Milvus Massive scalability, high dimensionality
Chroma Local in-memory, ultra-low latency
Qdrant Speed, filters enable semantic matching
Faiss Huge-scale vector indexing/search
LlamaIndex Framework for building LLM apps

Combine vector databases with LangChain for maximum impact

I don‘t want to leave vector databases without mentioning LangChain. It has quickly become my go-to library for building on top of LLMs.

LangChain provides a Python framework that abstracts away a lot of complexity when working with models like GPT-3. This lets developers focus on creating amazing AI applications!

Unlike the vector databases we covered which each serve specific use cases, LangChain integrates with ALL of them. You can easily swap out different vector data sources without changing your code.

The flexibility of LangChain, combined with the maturation of open source vector databases, makes this an incredibly exciting time for developers. We really are just scratching the surface of what‘s possible in combining these amazing tools.

I‘m happy to chat more about how to practically apply these technologies if helpful. Just let me know!

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *